Commercial Courtwatch | Week of 10/14/24
Copyright | Copyright infringement case can proceed in Utah against Chinese company because company consented to jurisdiction in any district where Amazon “may be found.” Tenth Circuit.
Discovery | Irreparable harm based on compelled production of donor information warrants stay of district court order pending appeal. Fifth Circuit.
Chronicling business litigation from the Federal Courts of Appeals and Delaware
Copyright | Copyright infringement case can proceed in Utah against Chinese company because company consented to jurisdiction in any district where Amazon “may be found.” Tenth Circuit.
Discovery | Irreparable harm based on compelled production of donor information warrants stay of district court order pending appeal. Fifth Circuit.
Experts | Experts failed to identify a statistically significant link between chemical exposure and chronic conditions, a key element in proving general causation, making grain of Daubert appropriate. Eleventh Circuit.
False Claims Act | First-to-file rule is not jurisdictional (en banc). Ninth Circuit.
Patent | Award of fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 because plaintiff continued to litigate case despite claim construction order undermining infringement position. Federal Circuit.
Patent | Patent exhaustion doctrine bared party from suing infringing customers of licensee counterparty. Tenth Circuit.
Privacy | Signing up for online newsletter to NBA website with a video streaming plausibly makes one subscriber of goods or services under the VPPA. Second Circuit.
Securities | No 10b5 securities fraud if would have purchased company securities to cover short position even absent allegedly misleading public statements about crypto dividend. Tenth Circuit.
Standing | Purchasers of sunscreen that included the toxic chemical benzene has justifiable injury-in-fact because she suffered economic harm due to overpayment for product. Ninth Circuit.
Trademark | Purchasing a search engine keyword that is a competitor’s trademark not trademark infringement. Second Circuit.
Trial | Abuse of discretion to not allow cross examination re past false statements unrelated to the case, warranting a new trial. First Circuit.